Book Review: SPQR, A History of Ancient Rome
By Mary Beard
More than 1500 years have passed since
Alaric and his horde of rampaging Visigoths sacked Rome in 410 CE, yet the
Roman Empire lives on in the public conscience. So much of our language and our
culture stems from the ancient Romans, and everyone ranging from artists to Fortune
500 CEOs are influenced by their words and deeds. From the popular French
cartoon Asterix to the ubiquitous “Even you, my Brutus”, that someone might say
when he or she is betrayed by a close friend and about to be stabbed in the
back, ancient Rome lives on in our modern era. SPQR is an ambitious work that
attempts to get to the bottom of what it was that made Rome so special, how it
came to pass that the republic was replaced by a dictatorship and how the
Romans thought of themselves and their empire.
Mary Beard is a professor of classics at
Newnham College, Cambridge, who has spent more than five decades researching
ancient Rome with great fascination. Her passion and great interest in the
subject is clear from the very first page and the book is a splendid love
letter to her field of academic excellence. Beard is a thoroughly modern
historian. What I mean by that might not be obvious, so allow me to explain.
Since I am utterly devoted to my readers, I have spent some time leafing through
a couple of musty old history books about Rome written during the middle of the
last century. Generally, historians of yore were rather boring, with the
possible exception of Edward Gibbon. They treated history very seriously
indeed, and never thought to sprinkle their pages with a bit of dry humor.
What´s more, they made sweeping and more or less untrue declarations that ran
something like “Compared to Greek, the Roman language is straightforward and
simple, reflecting the Latin people´s hard work ethic, discipline and stoic
demeanor.” I improvised that last sentence myself, but it´s what an old-timey
historian would have said with a straight face. Beard writes about such well
known characters as Julius Caesar and Marcus Tullius Cicero, but she also
writes about the common men and women who lived their lives cheek by jowl in
Cicero´s ramshackle housing. One of the old tomes called Cicero “the greatest
orator of ancient Rome”, which he certainly was. But he was also a rapacious
slumlord who built such shoddy tenement flats that they frequently collapsed
and killed scores of hapless tenants. Beard will also remark on the hilarity of
a half-mad Commodus clutching a severed ostrich head while berating his long
suffering colleagues in the senate.
The origins of Rome are shrouded in
mystery, but Beard reasonably points out that Aeneas fleeing the sack of Troy
to seduce a Carthaginian queen and then proceeding to be the bottom most root
of Romulus and Remus´s family tree might not be entirely true. What we do know,
however, is that Rome started out as a fairly unremarkable city state in
central Italy. Rome waged several wars against neighboring states, and
eventually went on to be the master of the Italian peninsula. Beard points to
Rome´s political system, where conquered cities and peoples were allowed to
keep their local deities and go on with their lives as long as they payed taxes
to Rome and supported her when she needed able bodied men to wage war. It is
impossible for us to know exactly how Roman these people felt, but the Social
War of BCE 90-88, when numerous Italian cities, including Pompeii, rose in
revolt against Roman rule, shows us that people did not become Roman simply
because they lived on the red bits on the map.
Contrary to what many may think, there
probably wasn´t any manifest Roman destiny from the beginning, nor was Rome
always the bloodthirsty aggressor attacking peaceful neighbors in opportunistic
land grabs. Sometimes neighboring states asked for Roman assistance when
confronted with dangerous rivals, sometimes Rome was threatened by bloodthirsty
enemies at the gate, and sometimes, obviously, an insecure emperor needed to
add a bit of martial glory to his name and went off to conquer and plunder.
Before they knew it, the Romans had themselves an empire, and empires, as the
late Gore Vidal warned, are dangerous things, and very hard to get rid of.
Roman institutions during the late republic
never adapted to these vastly changed circumstances. The soldiers of the
legions were loyal to their commanders first and foremost, since they were the
ones who fixed them up with a plot of land upon their retirement. A couple of
senile old men in the senate telling their beloved commander to stand down and
hand over his commission was hardly something they cared about. First Sulla,
and then Caesar, defied the senate and marched their soldiers into the city.
The century before the birth of Christ saw violent civil wars that nearly tore
the Roman world asunder, until Caesar´s adopted son, Octavian, emerged as the
ultimate winner and came to rule over a vast empire as the first among equals.
Octavian assumed the mantle of Augustus, this came as a surprise since no one really
knew what the word meant, and the template that he laid down for autocratic
governance lasted the following two centuries.
There were a couple of bumps in the road
during these heady days of the Pax Romana, such as the occasional mad emperor
clutching severed ostrich heads and the infamous year of the four emperors in
CE 69, but the Roman Empire effectively became a hereditary monarchy. The most
dangerous part of this process, Beard argues, was when the old Caesar lay on
his deathbed. As long as there was someone nearby who was not mad and either
related to or adopted by the incumbent emperor, everything was good and well.
However, barbarian incursions, inequality, infighting among the roman elites
and ambitious commanders with a couple of loyal legions at their back and a lot
of charisma eventually took their toll. There is no single explanation for the
downfall of the Roman Empire, the subject would require a book in itself, and
Beard even goes so far as to suggest that the Empire may not even have declined,
it just morphed into something else. SPQR covers so many interesting topics
that I am quite unable to dive into every one of them, but it would suffice to
say that Beard has hardly been dragging her feet.
I would heartily recommend SPQR to anyone
who is interested in ancient history and probably also to those who aren´t but
are feeling adventurous. The book may be several hundred pages thick, but as someone
who wasn´t Roman once said “a good book always ends too soon”. Beard sheds new
light on fascinating topics that scholars have long discussed, and does this
with plenty of humor, passion and accessibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment